(1 customer review)

Himber’s Fifth Dimension (Streamlined version) by Merv Taylor, Richard Himber

(c. 1944,1945)

Thank-you so much for taking the time to update and improve the content on MartinsMagic.com. It has taken twenty years to build this website and we’re just getting started! You can read more about our History Project here.

With your help we can continue to grow the site and maintain it’s standing as the Largest Online Magic Collection today and as a free resource for all magicians to share around the world. Please take the time to fill-in as many details below as you can. (We look at all submissions, but It might take a few days to validate your comments and make the changes so please bear with us.)

1 review for Himber’s Fifth Dimension (Streamlined version) by Merv Taylor, Richard Himber

  1. Andy Martin

    Piece-by-Piece Card restorations began in the 19th century with Hofzinser and Roterberg, but these were relatively primitive compared to the Visible Restoratation of a Card created by Okito (c. 1909); (See: Conjuring Credits).

    Richard Himber’s Fifth Dimension was cleary a descendant to Okito’s version, whether Richard Himber admitted it at the time or not. Himber’s initial version used a larger wooden frame, 5.5″ x 7″ x 1″, and the first copy reportedly sold for $200 in 1944 (which would have been approximately $3,681 in 2025), but most of them after that sold for around $25.

    About a year after the original run Himber had Merv Taylor create a new streamlined thin steel version and it was quite stunning and was a lot smaller, particularly the thickness: 5″ x 6.5″ x 3/8″.  This streamlined version really is a beauty and is significantly smaller than even Collectors’ Workshop’s Vienna Card Frame that was released over 40 years later (see the final photos at the end on this page).

    This is a lovely piece of craftsmanship from Merv Taylor.  It is easy to set and works perfectly. The only slight inconvenience is  that it was built for bridge sized cards not poker.  If I had a choice of this one or the CW one, I’d choose this one.  In this case smaller is certainly better 🙂

Add a review

If you want to submit a product review click here.

You may also like…